commit f296c00014594b461d440db112809821807d5f12
parent 27eb8fd5d3affcaf847a942abe1b199268e19bd0
Author: robert <robertrussell.72001@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:29:53 -0800
Add remark about math enc
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mathenc.tex b/mathenc.tex
@@ -90,6 +90,18 @@
\mathchardef\Psi="0009
\mathchardef\Omega="000A
+% TODO we probably should not provide names for everything below. It's better
+% to just provide names for the things very likely to be used and without
+% aliasing (e.g., \forall). Things like \bigtriangleup are likely to be given
+% a more semantic name if used at all, and so we should probably leave it
+% undefined. If somebody wants it, they can look at the font tables and make
+% the appropriate definition.
+% Actually, but then there is the issue of different math fonts having
+% different encodings. We really do need an extra layer of naming on top.
+% Maybe we can invent a very mechanical naming scheme (cf. Adobe's naming
+% scheme) that, e.g., provisions for unfilled/filled shapes, single vs double
+% vs triple vs etc. stroke arrows, etc.
+
\mathchardef\aleph="0240
\def\hbar{{\mathchar'26 \mkern-9mu h}}
\mathchardef\imath="017B
